Archive for September 13th, 2009

Sunday, September 13th, 2009

RealClearSports.com: Serena Should Have Said She Was Sorry

By Art Spander
For RealClearSports.com

NEW YORK — What’s the problem with saying you’re sorry, with admitting you were wrong? To err is human, we’ve been told. So you make your mistake and tell everyone it was a mistake. Unless you’re an athlete.

You’ve seen those phony statements, concocted by agents, where the individual deftly steps around the issue, never point-blank says, “I screwed up, and I’d like to say I’m sorry.”

Which is what Serena Williams should have said.

She’s one of two or three best tennis female players in the world, arguably the best. But Serena embarrassed herself, embarrassed her sport during a U.S. Open semifinal.

Lost control. Lost the match. Was mad at herself and, in a expletive-filled tirade, took it out on a lineswoman who even Serena later conceded only was doing what she is paid to do.

A foot fault is a rare call in tennis. It occurs when a server touches the baseline with either foot. Despite denials that she never foot-faults, and seemingly is only guilty in New York, Serena has been called many times in her career.

When she was called in the U.S. Open semi was a problem, down a set to Kim Clijsters, losing 5-4 in the second set and 15-30 in the game. Foot fault. Suddenly it was 15-40, suddenly it was match point.

Suddenly Serena Williams, defending champion, 11-time Grand Slam winner, turned into an immature, foul-mouthed tennis brat.

She held a ball in her left hand, a racquet in her right and extending the left arm told the lineswoman, “I’m going to stuff this (bleeping) ball down your (bleeping) throat.”

In the NFL or the NBA or baseball, that threat would result in instant ejection. What it got Serena was a code warning, which, added to the warning she received for bashing her racket to the court in the first set, cost her a point. And at 15-40, that point meant game, set and match to Clijsters.

Whether a foot fault should be called at that juncture is a legitimate question, the same as whether a foul should be called in basketball in a tie game and a man driving to the basket and a second on the clock. But whether Serena disgraced herself is not a question. She did.

What she didn’t do was apologize. In the post-match interview, a rather insincere Serena Williams, insisted, “I didn’t threaten. I didn’t say . . . I don’t remember anymore. I was in the moment . . . I don’t think it’s necessary for me to speak about it. I’ve let it go. I’m trying to move on.”

So someone wondered if the lineswoman deserved an apology, and Serena, in her haughtiest voice, answered, “An apology for? From me? How many people yell at linespeople? . . .Players, athletes get frustrated. I don’t know how many times I’ve seen that happen.”

That’s no justification. Serena confided she has a temper, which is not an indictable offense. Serena confided one of her heroes was John McEnroe, notorious for his language when berating officials.

But Serena is almost 28 years old, supposedly a role model, as well as a fashion model. She’s always placing a bottle of Gatorade next to the microphone during interviews to promote one of her endorsements. You think the company likes one of its stars swearing like a street punk?

Tennis is personality-driven. It is Serena Williams and Roger Federer who bring the attention. This isn’t exactly inmates-running-the-asylum material, but the players have control. Even when they’re out of control.
They are the lifeblood of their sport. They can get away with virtually anything.

Serena was fined $10,000, but she wasn’t suspended. Having her beaten before the final of the Open was bad enough. She was the last American standing in American’s championship. Not that she would have been standing even if she didn’t go into her diatribe.

Clijsters, three months out of retirement, was outplaying Serena. Serena knew it. Serena was angry at herself. She took out it out on the lineswoman, of whom later Williams said, “If she called a foot fault, she must have seen a foot fault. I’m not going to knock her for doing her job.”

She didn’t knock her, she trashed her. It was shameful. Then Serena had second thoughts. Then Serena was contrite. But she wouldn’t apologize.

“It was a tough day,” Williams justified. “I didn’t play my best.”

Asked if she regretted losing her head, if briefly, Serena said, “I haven’t really thought about it to have any regrets. I try not to live my life saying, ‘I wish, I wish.’ I was out there and fought and I tried and I did my best.”

Her best was not very good. What we wish is a woman of Serena Williams’ talent and reputation could say simply, “I apologize.” We’d let it go at that.

As a reporter since 1960, Art Spander is a living treasure of sports history. A recipient of the Dick McCann Memorial Award — given for his long and distinguished career covering professional football — he has earned himself a spot in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. He was recently honored with the Lifetime Achievement Award by the PGA of America for 2009.

- - - - - -

http://www1.realclearsports.com/articles/2009/09/13/serena_should_have_said_she_was_sorry_96481.html
© RealClearSports 2009

Sunday, September 13th, 2009

CBSSports.com: Serena’s shocking outburst continues bizarre Open

By Art Spander
The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.com

NEW YORK — The ending was bizarre. The result was stunning. Serena Williams was bounced from the U.S. Open, as earlier she had bounced her racquet in disgust, on a code violation for cursing a lineswoman.

It was a sorry ending to what had been a competitive match, with Kim Clijsters basically outplaying Serena and then standing in disbelief as Williams was told the point she was penalized was the point that gave Clijsters the semifinal victory, 6-4, 7-5.

Williams, the defending champion, was serving at 15-30 in the 12th game of the second set Saturday night when she was called by lineswoman for a foot fault, meaning Williams’ foot was judged to be over the baseline.

Serena screamed at the woman, “I’m going to shove this [deleted] ball down your [deleted] throat.”

The lineswoman reported Williams’ comments to chair umpire Louis Engzell, who then called a second code violation, which — added to the one assessed to Williams when she bashed her racquet in the first set — resulted in a loss of a point.

That point gave Clijsters the game and thus the match.

“I don’t remember what I said,” was Serena’s comment when asked how she addressed the lineswoman. “You didn’t hear? I said something; I guess they gave me a point penalty. Unfortunately, it was on match point.

“I’ve never been foot-faulted, and then suddenly in this tournament they keep calling foot faults. I don’t know why [the lineswoman] said she felt threatened. I’ve never been in a fight in my life. I didn’t think I would get a point penalty.”

And nobody thought Clijsters would become the first unseeded player in the women’s final since Serena’s older sister, Venus, in 1997. Clijsters, back from a two-year retirement in which she married and had a daughter, will face Caroline Wozniacki in Sunday night’s final. Wozniacki beat Yanina Wickmayer, 6-3, 6-3, in the other semifinal.

The way things had been going during this Open, anything was possible. Play had been rained out completely Friday, and then more rain Saturday forced postponement or rescheduling of numerous matches, including the two women’s semis.

Normally held on Friday afternoon on the main court, Ashe Stadium, the women’s semis were pushed back and back and back. Finally, the Wozniacki-Wickmayer match was shifted to the smaller Armstrong Court, and, after a lot of drying with hot air blowers, the two matches began simultaneously around 9:20 p.m. ET.

Serena, the No. 2 seed, never seemed in the match. She was broken three times. Then she lost her temper.

“That was a tough day,” Williams said. “I didn’t play my best.”

But she also gave credit to the 26-year-old Clijsters, whose speed and strength were the equal of Serena, if not superior.

“Kim played well,” Williams said. “I wasn’t surprised. I saw her play in Cincinnati, and she played incredible. I thought, ‘Wow, this is someone to watch out for.’ I think it’s really good to have her back on tour.”

Clijsters, from Belgium, was champion in 2005. She was unable to defend in 2006 because of an injury, then in ‘07 dropped out to get married and start a family. But when asked earlier this year to play an exhibition with England’s Tin Henman against Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf, Clijsters got into shape in earnest. Now, in her third women’s tour event after the return, she has surprised everyone.

Including herself.

“I’m in shock, really,” was Clijsters’ response when asked about reaching the final.

For Williams, a few days from her 28th birthday, the word is shocking. One moment she walks up to serve, the next she’s being informed she’s no longer playing.

“After she was called for the foot fault,” tournament referee Brian Earley said, “she said something to the line umpire, who reported to the chair umpire. That resulted in a point penalty. It just so happens, that was match point.”

Clijsters was as bewildered as Serena. Then again, while play went on, she was bewildering Serena.

“I came out of the blocks really well,” Clijsters said. “I kept her on her back foot a little bit.”

It was the front foot, when Serena was serving from the ad court, that did her in.

“If she called a foot fault,” a contrite Williams said later, “she must have seen a foot fault. I mean, she was doing her job. I’m not going to knock her for doing her job.”

When asked if she should apologize to the lineswoman, Serena said rhetorically, “An apology? For what? How many people yell at linespeople? “Players, athletes get frustrated. I’m sorry, but a lot of people have said a lot worse.”

But not on this evening, in a semifinal of the U.S. Open.

- - - - - -

http://www.cbssports.com/tennis/story/12196880

© 2009 CBS Interactive. All rights reserved.